2024 Aliling v. feliciano

Aliling v. feliciano

Author: ghxv

August undefined, 2024

WebFeb 20, 2024 · Petitioner Marvin O. Daguinod (Daguinod) was assigned as counter crew/cashier of a Jollibee franchise located in Alphaland Southgate Mall, Makati City (Jollibee Alphaland) pursuant to a Service Agreement [4] between Generation One Resource Service and Multi-Purpose Cooperative (Generation One) and the franchise … Webthird division g.r. no. 185829, april 25, 2012 armando aliling, petitioner, vs. JOSE B. FELICIANO, MANUEL F. SAN MATEO III, JOSEPH R. LARIOSA, AND WIDE WIDE …

G.R. No. 199554 - Lawphil

WebBefore the Court is a petition for review on certiorari seeking to annul and set aside the Decision 1 and Resolution 2 of the Court of Appeals (CA), dated January 23, 2013 and June 17, 2013, respectively, in CA-G.R. SP No. 125091.The assailed CA Decision affirmed the March 28, 2012 Resolution of the Fourth Division of the National Labor Relations … http://source.gosupra.com/docs/decision/58072 mecwacare trescowthick centre prahran

Aliling Vs Feliciano PDF Employment Salary - Scribd

WebSUMMARY: Alcara was employed on a probationary basis as a Regulatory Affairs Manager. NLRC and CA ruled that she was a regular employee who was illegally dismissed. SC reversed CA. An employees failure to perform the duties and responsibilities which have been clearly made known to him constitutes a justifiable basis for a probationary employees WebAliling vs. Feliciano Same; Same; Same; Labor Law; Findings of the Labor Arbiter, when affirmed by the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) and the Court of Appeals, are binding on the Supreme Court, unless patently erroneous.·Settled is the rule that the findings of the Labor Arbiter, when affirmed by the NLRC and the Court of WebPhilippine Normal University. LAW. LAW 728. 4._Aliling_vs._Feliciano_Digest.docx - CASE DIGESTS FOR LABOR02 KINDS OF EMPLOYMENT (4) Aliling vs. Feliciano … mecurk hair

G.R. No. 207898 - Supreme Court E-Library

[G.R. No. 185829 : April 25, 2012] ARMANDO ALILING

WebThis Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 assails and seeks to set aside the July 3, 2008 Decision 1 and December 15, 2008 Resolution 2 of the Court of Appeals (CA), in … WebBefore this Court on Petition for Review on Certiorari [1] is the Decision [2] dated October 17, 2013 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 125103, which reversed the Decision [3] dated February 29, 2012 and Resolution [4] dated May 7, 2012 of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) in NLRC LAC No. 08-002249-11, and reinstated with … pen gear solid binder pouch tealWebApr 22, 2014 · As a final point, Alcaraz cannot take refuge in Aliling v. Feliciano [12] (Aliling) since the same is not squarely applicable to the case at bar. The employee in Aliling, a sales executive, was belatedly informed of his quota requirement. Thus, considering the nature of his position, the fact that he was not informed of his sales quota … mecwacare malvern head office

"Web30 She adds that she was then 63 years old, and while one may opt to retire at 60 years old, the compulsory retirement age is 65 years old under Article 287, as amended.31 Petitioner Paz then argues respondent NTRCI’s misplaced reliance on Philippine Tobacco Flue-Curing & Redrying Corp. v. National Labor Relations Commission32 as that case ... " - Aliling v. feliciano

Aliling v. feliciano

WebIn Aliling v. Feliciano, 31 the Court explained to wit: The CA held the president of WWWEC, Jose B. Feliciano, San Mateo and Lariosa jointly and severally liable for the monetary awards of Aliling on the ground that the officers are considered "employers" acting in the interest of the corporation. WebJun 3, 2024 · ARMANDO ALILING, PETITIONER, VS. JOSE B. FELICIANO, MANUEL F. SAN MATEO III, JOSEPH R. LARIOSA, AND WIDE WIDE WORLD EXPRESS CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS. DECISION VELASCO JR., J.: The Case This Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 assails and seeks to set aside

Did you know?

Weblabor case digests Moises v. NLRC, Buenaventura Magsalin vs N.O.W.M. (National Working Organization of Working Men) ARMANDO ALILING V. JOSE FELICIANO AND WIDE … WebARMANDO ALILING, petitioner, vs. JOSE B. FELICIANO, MANUEL F. SAN MATEO III, JOSEPH R. LARIOSA, and WIDE WIDE WORLD EXPRESS CORPORATION, …

WebJun 28, 2016 · In Aliling v. Feliciano, [69] the Court held that an employer is entitled to impose productivity standards for its employees, and the latter's non-compliance therewith can lead to his termination from work, viz .: WebIn the case of Aliling v. Feliciano, 23 citing Golden Ace Builders v. Talde, 24 the Court explained: Thus, an illegally dismissed employee is entitled to two reliefs: backwages …

WebFinally, according to the 2012 case of Aliling v. Feliciano, an employee’s failure to meet sales or work quotas falls under the concept of gross inefficiency, which in turn is … WebSep 9, 2024 · Alphaland claimed that Agustin failed to meet the following standards in order to qualify as regular employee: (1) that he was expected to render high quality of professional service; and (2) to always pursue the interest of the company. [16]

WebTHIRD DIVISION G.R. No. 185829, April 25, 2012 ARMANDO ALILING, PETITIONER, VS. JOSE B. FELICIANO, MANUEL F. SAN MATEO III, JOSEPH R. LARIOSA, AND WIDE WIDE WORLD EXPRESS CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N VELASCO JR., J.: The CaseThis Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 assails and seeks …

Webof 1 Legend International Resorts Ltd., vs. Kilusang Manggagawa ng Legenda G.R. No. 169754, Feb. 23, 2011 Facts: On June 6, 2001, KML filed with the Med-Arbitration Unit of the DOLE, San Fernando, Pampanga, a petition for certification election. KML alleged that it is a legitimate labor organization of the rank and file employees of Legend. mecwash ac32WebComparts Industries, Inc. 44 this Court held: The complete designation of this authorized cause is retrenchment to prevent losses precisely to save a financially ailing business establishment from eventually collapsing. Without the purpose to prevent losses, the termination becomes illegal. pen gear weekly monthly planner refillsWebG.R. No. 185829. April 25, 2012. pen gear weekly monthly planner refillWebIn Aliling v Feliciano the Court held that an employer is entitled to impose from BS ACCOUNT 101 at Philippine School of Business Administration, Quezon City mecury musicalsWebMay 9, 2003 · Magsalin v National Organization of Working Men GR No 148492 9 May 2003 2 from LAW 1 at San Beda College Manila - (Mendiola, Manila) Expert Help. Study Resources. ... Aliling v. Feliciano, G.R. No. 185829, 25 April 2012. Philippine Daily Inquirer v. Magtibay, G.R. No. 164532, 27 July 2007. mecwacare elsoft houseWebAug 9, 2024 · The case stems from two complaints for illegal dismissal and monetary claims filed against Alba Construction and its owner, Alba, by herein respondents with the Arbitration Branch of the NLRC. The first labor complaint, docketed as NLRC NCR Case No. 06-07959-14, [5] was filed by Conrado Gabe Espinosa (Conrado), Eusebio Mojica, Jaime … mecwacare ballan hostelWebThus, the NLRC held that Jacolbe's consistent failure to meet the reasonable work standards set by TP for a prolonged period of time exhibited incompetence, inefficiency, … mecwacare hoppers crossing